Belatedly, a brief report. A rather elaborate scavenger hunt was held in Vienna on 15 July, 2006 to celebrate my daughter's 17th birthday. Besides Beta, roughly half a dozen of her friends took part. The hunt took them to about ten interesting locations around Vienna.
Behind the scenes, roughly half a dozen of my friends took part. Maybe more. Maybe seventeen, actually. And those are just the people who signed up at the forum that was created to plot the game. But ganging up on the kids like that was fair, because the kids are all brilliant, and I'm not, and you know, weakest link etc etc. I'd guess more than 20 people helped out behind the scenes.
So you had this big gang of talented people working hard since April to put this scavenger hunt together.
I'm losing the thread here.
So, anyway, the facts:
About a week before the day of the hunt, Beta was visited by a stranger at her place of employment, who gave her a package to give to another person, who he told her would pick it up the following day. He was such a good actor that she readily took the package.
Later that night, she received a text message from Australia (this was an international team, by the way, from California to Australia, to half a dozen European countries) ostensibly from the woman informing her that she had accidentally gone to Australia instead of Austria and to open the package herself.
Inside was a blank journal and a couple blank scraps of paper. The journal was a present. The scraps, when heated, provided a URL of a blank page. Hidden in the source code was a message, ROT-13 encoded and written backwards.
Beta and her team quickly decoded the message, by hand, not using any of the many online tooks I had expected they would use.
About this time Beta started receiving dozens of postcards from around the world warning her off her hunt. Some included hidden messages, and other red herrings. Some were in Russian or other foreign languages.
[End of Part I. Part II tomorrow]
Latest Evco mission resounding success. Evaluation and debriefing still on-going, but I can tell you that much already. I forgot sunscreen, the day was quite sunny too, bad mistake. Beta seems to have loved it. Enjoyed the gathering afterwards, not sure if that bookstore/restaurant will allow me back in any time soon, quite a mess when we left. What do you expect from an evil conspiracy, right? Will post more on this later, must head for the hills right now for a couple days of hiking with visiting relatives. For now, I can post two conclusions:
The elegance and originality of Roland Barthes' thought and expression are legendary. It was this very quality that led Raymond Picard to attack him for what he vaguely termed disrespect to the "culture’s literary roots." But Barthes rebutted, in Criticism and Truth (1966), his precise passes split open Picard's defense, his fakes sent critics the wrong way, and he even twice pointed one way as if to indicate the direction of his pass and then turned around sharply in his signature spin move. He denigrated bourgeois criticism as "unconcerned with the finer points of language and capable of selective ignorance towards challenging concepts of theories like Marxism." His quarterfinal showing against Picard is considered by many semioticians one of his best performances and perhaps better than the final eight years previous.
A semiotician of uncommon skill and rare technical poise, Barthes' ability to control almost any text, his elegance, vision and penchant for big-game metaphors has seen him compared with some of the greatest creative talents in the game, like M.M.Bakhtin and Levi-Strauss.
I credit Barthes for, if not getting me interested in semiotics in the first place, at least holding my interest and inspiring me, in an almost heroic manner, if a grown man can be allowed to say such a thing.
Next to Barthes and his seminal works such as his 1968 essay “The Death of the Author”, which made such a lasting contribution to deconstructionist theory and investigated the logical ends of structuralist thought, Umberto Eco can be called a hack, a journeyman at best. Anyone who has seen videos of Eco's lectures cannot deny a distinct talent and charisma, but he does not approach the grace and professionalism of Barthes. Eco's habitual resort to dirty tactics, nasty fouls and violence against his opponents should, in my opinion, result not in a wink-wink-nudge-nudge "bad-boy" image, but indeed in his banishment from semiotics altogether.
No one knows what Eco said to Barthes that day. Barthes had taken a lot. He was exhausted. He had been taking hits all day long, including what looked to me like a shoulder injury intentionally inflicted by the opposing team. Barthes has a long fuse, that is well known. As is what happens when that fuse finally burns down.
We've all seen the instant replays, Eco holding Barthes' shirt, Barthes giving him a cold look and walking away. Then it happened. Eco followed him, still speaking. Maybe we will never know exactly what Eco said to him. Brazilian lip-readers say he called "Camera Lucida" a "shallow work of sentiment and grief." German experts, on the other hand, say Eco accused Barthes of "cribbing everything from Derrida." What happened next we all know - Eco flat on his back from an expert headbutt to the chest. Barthes was ejected from his final conference, entering what many expected would now be an ignominous retirement.
Much to everyone's surprise, Barthes' rash act only endeared him more to fans. A hero with feet of clay. Human, not god. Unforgettable, if not immortal.
He sits there thinking of all that has led to this moment. The long process of his personal development. His family history. Millennia of human history. Millions of years of human evolution. All the way back to amino acids growing self-conscious in boiling seas of ammonia. All the way back to stars forming, to the big bang. He washes his hands, sprays a little air-freshener around and
You are here, right? All your life has led to this moment. And not just you; your parents, and their parents, all the way back to Elvis.
Kind of a downer, isn't it? Evolution, schmevolution.
But there are things where you think, you think, wow.
I am referring, specifically but not exclusively, to solo cello music. Think of everything that has to come together for me to listen to Anner Bylsma playing Bach suites on a Stradivarius in my car on the way to work.
Anner Bylsma has to learn to play cello. Bach has to become a composer - someone has to teach him, and someone had to teach them, etc. Stradivari has to make a cello. It has to find its way to Bylsma. I have to somehow convince Bylsma to get into my car and play.
All these vectors converging at this point. All this human evolution leading to this sublime moment.
I hear Steven Isserlis is your man nowadays, for cello. My teacher neglected to let me know Isserlis was just in town recently, playing a couple concerts. He didn't tell me when Jorane was here either. Jorane, no big deal, but Isserlis.
I'm thinking, what's with the cellist names, anyway? Anner Bylsma, Steven Isserlis, Suren Bagratuni, Mily Balakirev, Pablo Casals, Yo-Yo Ma, Mischa Maisky.
To name but a few.
Do you have to have a posh name to play the cello? Not that I aspire to be anything but a crappy amateur cello player, so it's not like I'm crushed. Mig Living. Doesn't have that cello sound. OTOH, would you buy a book by someone with that name? I would. If I went into a bookstore, and there's a book by someone named Mig Living, I'd buy it. I'd be all, motherfucker, someone with my name published a book!
Actually, I'd probably leaf through it at the bookstore and think, dang, I could write better than that! I wouldn't buy it because I'd be jealous envious.
Does that bug you, how often people mix up jealousy and envy? It does me, worse than people who use the word "irony" wrong, because I don't always use it right either. You envy other people, you're jealous of your own stuff, get that through your heads, people who use jealous and envious wrong.
Solo cello music is one experience that makes me think about all the lines of evolution and fate that led to the moment, a close second to that is watching Funniest Home Videos on TV. With the music, you have an artist mastering her instrument and the family and cultural history that led to that. You have the luthier angle. You have the composer angle. You have the cultural scene that enables them to play, and perhaps the technological angle if it's a recording.
Here is this person playing, and no matter how great they are, they are standing on the shoulders of giants.
Usually, though, it's more like the Funniest Home Video thing. Gamma and I were watching that on TV at her grandparents' house recently. We were really howling. They used to show unexpurgated Tom and Jerry cartoons on TV when Beta was little, we used to howl like that. Gamma's grandfather came downstairs to see who was howling, that's how funny it was.
And I was thinking, this is another Anner Bylsma moment. Technology had to advance to the point that video/audio recording devices were easily portable. Economic development was necessary to reach the point that such devices became ubiquitous. Culturally, someone had to invent the birthday party, and the piñata, and the game of baseball or more specifically the baseball bat. And in this chaotic world, all these things had to converge. And boy, did they ever. Party after party, piñata after piñata. Little blindfolded kid after little blindfolded kid. Father doubled over in pain after father doubled over in pain.
All those people, with the exploding swimming pools, the crashing bikes, the psycho pets, the movers dropping pianos down stairs: standing on the shoulders of giants.
We're wasps on the shoulders of giants. Except wasps have elegant waists.
Bedbugs. We're bedbugs on the shoulders of giants. And when you look closely at the giants, if you squint, you notice that they're made of bedbugs too. As far as the eye can see. Bedbugs all the way down.
There was something I wanted from the cellar. I forget what. I walked to the stairs, turned on the light and froze. An animal was coming up the stairs. It froze too.
In fact, we sort of mimicked each other's body language for several seconds. I froze, it froze. It was like looking into a funhouse mirror that changes your reflected image into a mouse.
Mice are animals. They are wild animals, usually. They are mammals, what do I know, they can transmit rabies and shit.
I turned, slowly, and crouched to grab, what? Nothing in range. A dish, I could trap it under a dish and release it outside.
It turned, slowly, and crouched.
I leaned over and picked up a catfood dish.
The mouse darted under a cabinet. Fucker.
The can-fed red cat watched all this.
Come here, stupid. There, under the cabinet.
The cat sat and watched.
I picked him up. Pointed him towards the mouse like an uzi. Get him. Go for it.
Set him down beside the cabinet. He looked up at me. There!
I tapped my fingers along the base of the cabinet, the cat finally got the idea. Maybe he heard something running around underneath. I looked around for better equipment. Took a couple steps further down into the cellar.
The cat looked left. At just that instant, the mouse outflanked the cat, running past its right side and down the stairs.
It either hid behind the vaccuum cleaner, or went into the laundry room.
I am like, I am not the sort of man who stomps on little mice as they run past, especially not barefoot. And mice are usually barefoot.
I started moving the vaccuum, then thought, what happens if it is, indeed, behind there? i am wearing no socks, and baggy pants, it could run straight up the inside of my jeans into my boxers.
So I picked up a push broom instead. It turned out to be our broom where the broom part falls off the handle when you pick it up. So in fact, I stood there holding a stick.
This must be how billiards was invented. It's logical. You're sitting around the drawing room, your butler is chasing some mice around the room with a stick, they end up on the table, he's poking at them. Maybe you're poking at them too, maybe you have a fireplace poker in fact.
Maybe the last mouse you poke is the eight mouse.
Gamma liked this story. She is on the mouse's side. She forbids traps. She doesn't even like us to swat flies right now, so it's mice and flies as far as the eye can see at our house right now.
The cats are okay with that, too.
It's a fat little grey mouse, I told her.
You're a fat little grey mouse, she told me.